Budgeting for an online fundraising platform isn't just about dollars - it requires common sense.
Budgeting for online fundraising platforms is not just about dollars - it requires common sense.

What should you pay for an online fundraising platform?

It’s a simple question with no simple answer, but I’m not sure it’s the “right” question to ask.

It’s not as much about price as it is return on investment (ROI).

You might decide to use a low-cost service and discover the cost was still too high because the results were poor.

That would be a high-cost crowdfunding platform no matter how little they charge.

Or, you might hire a company that costs more but provides better services to ensure you get the results you need. Twelve months later, you will have realized some really good fundraising results, become better known to a new circle of donors, and have expanded your market share.

It shouldn’t matter if you’re paying more – as long as you’re GETTING MORE.

Let’s take a look at one real-life example:

Organization “P” ran a campaign with an online fundraising platform that, at first glance, appeared to be successful. The organization raised $502,762 from five fundraising teams who inspired 590 donors.

The next year, “P” ran a campaign with CauseMatch. They raised $1,067,119. This campaign enlisted 117 teams and reached 1,755 donors.

There’s no question that “P” could have continued their efforts with a lower-cost peer-to-peer fundraising platform. They may have even been satisfied with the amount they raised. But why settle for satisfied when you can be ecstatic? Is it worthwhile to save a few dollars when it means missing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars? Just think of how many more people your organization can help if you raise even a few thousand dollars more.

Let’s look at 12 other examples in bulk. This graph charts how many donors gave to 12 real organizations that used a cheaper option before turning to CauseMatch for their crowdfunding needs.

Ten of the 12 organizations received donations from more donors with CauseMatch. One of them (Org 8) more than DOUBLED the amount of donors to their campaign.

But number of donors is only side of the equation. The other side is about the dollars. How did these 12 organizations fair with CauseMatch?

Even the organizations that saw a reduction in the number of donors raised more money with CauseMatch. Four of them (Orgs 3, 7, 8, and 12) doubled the amount they raised, and one of them (Org 2) TRIPLED their total.

The bottom line is: when it comes to fundraising, it’s okay to pay more if it means you’ll raise more. Saving $1,000 on your fundraising platform but missing out on $5,000 or $10,000 of donations because the platform isn’t as robust, is, quite literally, saving a penny to spend a pound.

Wait a Second!

Would you like to subscribe to our blog
for more fundraising updates?
duta76 duta76 duta76 duta76
peri hokiperihokiduta76duta 76ABC1131 - MPO SLOTABC1131 Bandar Slot Togelmix parlay agen slot qrisMPOGALAXYslot thailandAWSBEThttps://premium-soft.com/Consulta-Licencias/https://sintnicolaasschool.com/https://abc1131aa.com/kincir88cakar76Slot mahjongABC1131ABC1131 LOGINhttps://abc1131.hartanzah.com/https://www.abc1131.it.com/stc76006 sinkronisasi momentum strategi hibrida pola scatter mahjong wild deluxe gates of olympus manajemen risiko dadu sicbo007 rekayasa taktik hibrida pola transformasi gold simbol mahjong ways 2 pgsoft baccarat prediksi starlight princess008 arsitektur kemenangan terpadu navigasi strategi blackjack optimasi peluang sweet bonanza mahjong wins 3 pragmatic009 dekonstruksi momentum strategi eksploitasi pola scatter mahjong ways 2 pgsoft teknik unit roulette wild west gold010 manifesto ekspertis navigasi rtp live sugar rush pola statis sv388 taktik kalkulasi blackjack mahjong wins 3 pragmatic011 rekayasa taktik lintas platform optimasi teknik analisa statistik mahjong wild deluxe gates of olympus dadu sicbo012 sinkronisasi data teknik rtp live mahjong ways 2 pgoft strategi baccarat statis dan dinamis starlight princess013 sinergi operasional integrasi teknik analisa statis blackjack dinamika sweet bonanza mahjong wins 3 pragmatic014 manifesto ekspertis rekayasa peluang algoritma pgsoft mahjong ways 2 pgsoft dinamika roulette wild west gold015 protokol strategis optimasi teknik analisa mahjong wins 3 pragmatic sugar rush sv388 blackjack proeksekusi taktik analisa pola gates of olympus dadu sicbo mahjong wild deluxetaktik peluang baccarat teknik analisa pola rtp live starlight princess mahjong ways 2 pgsoftsinergi strategi analisa peluang blackjack taktik teknik pola rtp live mahjong wins 3 pragmatic sweet bonanzaanalisa teknik peluang roulette taktik pola strategi rtp live mahjong ways 2 pgsoft wild west goldstrategi peluang blackjack analisa sv388 teknik taktik pola rtp live mahjong wins 3 pragmatic sugar rushoptimalisasi rtp live analisa pola mahjong wild taktik sicbo strategi olympuspemetaan peluang teknik baccarat analisa pola starlight princess strategi rtp live mahjong ways 2 pgsoftoptimalisasi peluang hibrida teknik strategi blackjack analisa pola sweet bonanza taktik rtp live mahjong wins 3 pragmaticdinamika algoritma analisa teknik roulette strategi pola wild west gold taktik rtp live mahjong ways 2 pgsoftsinkronisasi metodologi analisa teknik blackjack taktik pola sugar rush strategi rtp live mahjong wins 3 pragmatic sv388pola mahjong ways 2 spin manualmanajemen saldo olympus 1000jam gacor pragmatic vs pg softfitur baru pg soft 2026mekanik baru pragmatic playmitos rtp live slot onlinegame pg soft low volatilityefek spin turbo algoritma slotrahasia frame emas wild banditoreview fitur buy spin pragmaticintegrasi analisa pola taktik rtp live strategi mahjong wild deluxe dadu sicbo gates of olympusmetodologi strategi teknik rtp live analisa pola mahjong ways 2 pgsoft baccarat starlight princessrekayasa metodologi peluang blackjack pola mahjong wins 3 pragmatic teknik sweet bonanzakomputasi peluang analisa strategi roulette pola mahjong ways 2 pgsoft taktik wild west goldmetodologi taktik presisi peluang blackjack pola sugar rush analisa sv388 mahjong wins 3 pragmatic